Conners CI™ Spanish Edition
Conners Clinical Index
Filters
The Conners Clinical Index (Conners CI™) is a 24-item assessment that provides an overview of a child's functioning in social/emotional and behavioral areas. It serves as an indicator of potential clinical issues that may warrant further detailed assessment. The Conners CI is available as part of the Conners CBRS® and can also be purchased separately as a standalone form.
Age
- Parent & Teacher: 6 to 18
- Self Report: 8 to 18
Administration Type
- Parent
- Teacher
- Self
Administration Time
- 5 Minutes
Number of Items
- 24
Qualification Level
- B
Format(s)
- Online
- Useful as a quick screening and pre-evaluation instrument to identify if further evaluation is warranted in the following areas: Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Mood Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Learning and Language Disorders, and ADHD
- Assists in planning and monitoring treatment/intervention
- Disruptive Behavior
- Mood Disorders
- Anxiety Disorders
- Learning and Language Disorders
- ADHD
Assessment Reports provide detailed information about scores from a single administration, presented both numerically and graphically. An individual's scores are compared to those in the normative sample and elevations at the scale and subscale level are indicated.
Progress Reports compare the results of two to four administrations for the same individual to measure changes over time. These reports are ideal to use when monitoring treatment and intervention effectiveness.
Comparative Reports combine the results of different raters to provide an overview of an individual's scores from a multi-rater perspective. This highlights potentially important inter-rater differences in scores.
Reliability
The adjusted test-retest correlation for the Conners CI-P overall score was .87; the mean adjusted test-retest correlation for the subscales was .86 (ranging from .83 to .91).
The adjusted test-retest correlation for the Conners CI-T overall score was .92; the mean adjusted test-retest correlation for the subscales was .90 (ranging from .83 to .94).
Validity
Overall validity results suggest the Conners CI forms can accurately distinguish between relevant groups.
